Showing posts with label Thin Slabs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thin Slabs. Show all posts

Saturday, May 31, 2014

Memorial Day Weekend in the Trapps: Thin Slabs (5.7 Start), Deep Lichen (P3 5.8) & City Streets (5.10b)


(Photo: Mitch starting up City Streets (5.10b).)

Memorial Day Monday was a hot one this year. We awoke to find sunny skies and temperatures expected to reach the mid-eighties.

If only the New Paltz pool were open. Then my wife and kids would have gone there and I'd have been able to climb all day.

But since it wasn't open we planned to drive back to NYC in the early afternoon and Gail and I had just a few hours in which to climb.

As Gail and I walked into the Trapps I could already feel it getting hot. The conditions weren't ideal but I was still determined to try a new 5.10.

First we needed a warm-up. Some friends of Gail's had done Thin Slabs Direct (5.7+) the day before and their discussion of the wild traversing finish, past three old pins, put the climb back in my mind. I suggested we start there. I had led the Direct finish twice before but I'd never led the 5.7 start to Thin Slabs at the bottom of the cliff. I remembered that the one time I followed it I had thought it was tough to get off the ground and that several moves seemed hard to me for 5.7.

Leading the route on Monday did not change my opinion. I easily made the first move up but for several moves in a row I felt the climbing was steep and thin, with gear available everywhere but fiddly to place in the often flaring diagonal crack. It didn't ease off for about twenty feet. Along the way, as I tried to stay calm and shake off the Elvis leg, I decided that this supposed 5.7 start is very much like a slightly longer version of the challenging start of the first pitch of Son of Easy O, which is a hard 5.8. Gail disagrees with me, but I just don't see this right-hand start of Thin Slabs as a 5.7. Sorry.

Some warm up!

At any rate it is good climbing, and I continued all the way to the GT Ledge in one pitch. After the tough beginning the rest of the climbing to the GT Ledge is easy and a little bit dirty at times.

Once I got to the ledge I was disappointed to see that the start of the Thin Slabs Direct pitch was wet. It was yucky just at the opening moves, and not for any of the exciting traverse. We could have gotten through the seepy bits if we were really determined to do Thin Slabs Direct. But I'd done it before so it didn't seem worth it.

We moved to the right to check out the climbs at the left end of the Arrow wall. I'd been interested for years in trying the upper pitches of two different obscure climbs, Deep Lichen and Steep Hikin', but I'd never gotten around to doing either one. These pitches go at 5.8 and 5.6, respectively, and they sit on a wall book ended by the large, dirty Snake corner on the left and the shallower Red Pillar corner on the right. Dick Williams recommends them in his guidebook as nice pitches to throw in after Three Doves (5.8+) or Annie Oh! (5.8).

When we arrived at this wall on Monday, we saw only one clean path up the middle of the wall. We couldn't spot another route between this one strip of clear rock and Red Pillar. We didn't have the book with us and we had no way to tell whether the path we were looking at was the 5.6 or the 5.8. It looked like decent climbing. I saw a few horizontals that looked like they would take gear. I also thought I could spot the crux, a blank headwall about two thirds of the way up, right above a little pod.

It looked like fun climbing on good white rock. We decided to do it.

Later on I looked at the book and figured out that this was Deep Lichen, the 5.8 pitch.

Dick Williams calls it PG but it is actually quite run out. After the initial moves and a few placements, there is a somewhat cruxy thin move up on some small crimps to a better hand rail. This move isn't ridiculously far from the gear but you are a ways above your last piece. You don't want to fall here. Then the climbing continues without any placements for several more moves. This portion of the pitch may be easier than 5.8 (which is probably why Dick gave the route a PG rating) but it isn't much easier. It is still thoughtful climbing and by the time you finally get pro at a bomber horizontal you are likely far enough out that a fall would take you all the way back to the GT Ledge. I felt like I was really out there.

When I arrived intact at the bomber horizontal I threw in two pieces. The gear improved thereafter. The crux did indeed come a bit higher, at the blank headwall above the pod, and I was able to get a good nut right at the top of the pod so I felt well protected for the interesting, delicate and reachy crux sequence.

I liked the climbing on Deep Lichen, though I don't know that I would do it again, now that I know how run out it is. I later checked the Swain guide and found that he describes the pitch as 5.8+ R. I felt satisfied with how I handled the pitch, and I think I have to admit I enjoy the head space that I get into on leads like this (Turdland is another example), where the climbing is less than vertical and you can carefully analyze each move without fear of pumping out. When falling is not an option, the climb becomes a series of puzzles and each critical move, each individual hand and toe placement, gets serious consideration and focus.

I can't say why I felt so shaky on Thin Slabs, where the pro was great, yet so calm on the supposedly harder and definitely far more dangerous Deep Lichen.

Maybe we rise to the occasion when it really counts.

From the top of Deep Lichen we rapped down the Arrow bolts and found that we were already running out of time. Gail knew I wanted to try a 5.10 and she suggested the nearby City Streets (5.10b). Several weeks ago, while we were doing V-3, right next door, we'd both become intrigued when we watched a climber working hard on this route, trying some pretty weird hand matching and swinging to get through the roof problem. He took a number of short falls on the crux piton, and this guy was substantially bigger than me, so I felt pretty assured about the pin's integrity.

Dick Williams gives City Streets no stars and dismisses it as a one-move wonder. But the fact that it has just one hard move makes it a good entry-level ten and the pin right below the roof makes the climb feel like a very approachable lead.


(Photo: Gail getting set to try the roof on City Streets (5.10b).)

My only concern about the climb was that, in my experience, Gunks climbs that have just one crux move usually have one hell of a crux move. I worried that I wouldn't be able to figure out the sequence and that I'd fail.

But you'll never know unless you try, right?

So I racked up and tried it.

It went well! The initial moves up a shallow corner are moderate and interesting. Then you reach a little shelf beneath the overhang. I could see an obvious, chalky horn up to the right of the fixed pin. But I couldn't tell where I was going over the big roof. I wasted some time going up and down and trying to get a piece into the irregular space behind the good horn. But it wasn't working out and eventually I just stepped up to the horn and clipped the pin, calling it good. I probably should have tried harder to back up the pin.


(Photo: Going for it on City Streets.)

And then I started to work at the crux move. A few missions up and down, testing various potential holds, told me that all of the intermediate holds were crap. I could see the good hold, but it was very far to the left. I thought I might be able to reach it if I set my feet just right.

One good thing about this route is that you can get fully into the crux and if it isn't working out you can climb down out of it and reset. I did this several times, testing various ways to reach over to the left. And when I got my feet up just right and grabbed the jug it was a great feeling.


(Photo: Relieved to have on-sighted City Streets (5.10b)!)

After you get over the roof you still have to make a few moves up a corner and then escape right to the anchor tree. The moves are easy and there is good gear at the top of the corner but be careful because a fall as you move up the corner would not be good. I stuck a nut in a v-slot that was about knee level after I was standing above the roof but I thought this nut was not likely to stay put if it were actually tested.

City Streets may not be the easiest 5.10. The one move is hard. But it might well be the easiest 5.10 to lead. The crux is short, the gear is good, and you can climb up and down to your heart's content.

That was it for me. Gail's husband Mitch came out and met us right as I was finishing the crux of City Streets. After Gail and Mitch had a go at the route, I took off and they kept climbing. It was a short day for me but pretty productive, with two new routes and one 5.10 tick off of my list.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Those Pesky Gunks Sevens!

(Photo: That's me in the yellow/green jacket past the crux on Thin Slabs Direct (5.7+).)

In my last post I discussed (and expressed skepticism about) several supposed 5.8 sandbags in the Trapps.

Then on Friday of last week, climbing with a new partner Matt, I was reminded of some other sandbags that are not so easily dismissed.

These climbs are like landmines for the unsuspecting leader. They promise smooth, moderate sailing but instead deliver moments of puzzlement and sketchitude.

I speak, of course, of those bewildering oddites otherwise known as Gunks 5.7's.

Last Friday Matt and I were hoping to jump on Birdie Party, but we found it occupied. Matt suggested we do Anguish instead since it was open and neither of us had done it. It seemed like a good idea to me.  I intended to link the first two pitches in one and take us all the way up to the GT Ledge. Matt would take the crux 5.8 pitch to the top.  I thought the first two pitches looked pretty easy, except for the new crux of the first pitch that Dick Williams described in his 2004 guidebook. Instead of the traditional route, which moved to the right over a flake/corner at 5.4, Dick now recommends a roof escape to the left at 5.7-.

I thought I remembered a thread on Gunks.com where folks had complained that this roof escape felt much harder than 5.7.  (I can't find such a thread now, so maybe it never existed.)  But I wasn't worried.  I thought it might feel like a 5.8, but so what?  I'd be fine.  How bad could it be?

Then I got up there under the roof and found out.

I had pro in the corner but it was all the way at the back.  I tried to get something in the little flaring notch at the lip of the roof but I couldn't get anything on my rack to stick. 

Then I started to pull over the roof, looking for holds, but whatever holds there were seemed very far away.

So I retreated a bit to a stance and thought it over.  Dick said escape left, I realized.  He didn't say to pull the roof directly.

Going back up, I tried to follow Dick's orders and escape left.  I got a hold of some small crimps and moved around the outside arete.  But this put me at a really pumpy stance and the next move up was far from certain.  Plus my pro was over to the right and back in the corner.  I didn't like this at all.  I retreated again.

Three or four times I tried to make my escape but on each occasion I didn't like the move or the potential fall so I came back.  And then, defeated, I finally said "screw it" and finished the pitch the 5.4 way. 

What a way to start a new climbing partnership!  Bailing on a 5.7-.

Matt led the 5.8 pitch three of Anguish and it is really very good.  It has some nice crux moves up to the overhang; then the overhang itself is a bit easier.  The rest of the way is even more casual but the gear is a little thin.  The topout requires a few easy slab moves above your pro.

I wouldn't bother to repeat pitches one and two of Anguish-- the quality moments are few, even if you include the part I skipped-- but if I were descending from another climb using the nearby Three Pines rappel route I would definitely consider running up the third pitch of Anguish again.  The pitch begins on the GT Ledge right around the corner from the bolted anchor, and once you top out it's an easy walk just a few yards over to the bolts on top of the cliff for the descent.

Later in the day, after I'd redeemed myself a bit and led some harder climbs, I mentioned how embarrassed I was to have begun the day by chickening out on a 5.7-.  Matt responded that he'd taken a fall at the tricky crux move of Baskerville Terrace (5.7) just a few weeks before-- and this right after a successful lead of Roseland (5.9)!  So I didn't have to feel too bad.  He knew what I was going through.

Those pesky sevens!

There sure seem to be a lot of "problem" sevens at the Gunks, no?  I've certainly had more 5.7 difficulties than 5.8 difficulties.  I've never bailed on a 5.8 lead.  But here I abandoned Anguish pitch one, and I also remember a couple of seasons ago trying the opening move to Trapped Like a Rat (5.7) and then abandoning that one too.  And don't even get me started on that stupid grease-pole-of-a-sandbag Laurel.  Come to think of it, I once bailed on a 5.8:  Drunkard's Delight (5.8-), but that route too was until recently considered a 5.7+! 

We finished our day last Friday with perhaps the mother of all 5.7 sandbags: Thin Slabs Direct. 

Matt led the 5.7 variation to pitch one, and wouldn't you know it, as he approached the end of the vertical crack that marks the early part of the route, I heard him muttering "Why is this so tricky??" 

And then "Watch me here!" 

But he sketched through the hard part and then took the lead all the way to the GT Ledge. 

When it was my turn to follow I was kind of shocked at how thin the first two steps off the ground were.  I wasn't sure I could even get started on the pitch.  But we all know that no matter how hard the first move is, it doesn't count as part of the difficulty rating in the Gunks.  Once I got my feet on the wall and my hands in the crack, I thought the climbing was enjoyable and, yes, kind of stiff for 5.7.

When I got near the top of the crack I saw what Matt had been concerned about.  The hands were good, but the feet were smeary.  I knew with one more reach the angle would ease off; the harder variation start would be over.  As I smeared and reached up with the security of the toprope, I thought: "nice lead!"

And:  "5.7??"

Once I got to the GT Ledge I had to confront the Thin Slabs Direct finish, which is supposedly 5.7+.  This variation has the distinction of being the only "direct" finish I can think of that is actually substantially less direct than the regular route.  It is in fact the very antithesis of "direct."  The whole point of the variation is to force the leader to traverse to the right for fifteen to twenty feet out of the way, over a terrifying drop, with slippery hands and no real footholds to speak of. 

I first attempted this pitch in 2009.  Before I got to the Direct finish, I led Sente, onsight, to start the climb.  This was my first 5.9 lead ever, which made me very proud.  Then I joined Thin Slabs up to the GT Ledge and promptly got thoroughly humbled by Thin Slabs Direct.  I remember being so pumped as I attempted it.  I found it very difficult to let go with one hand long enough to clip the three ancient pitons that line the traverse; forget about even attempting to place my own gear.  Eventually, after going out and back a few times and taking a hang in the middle, I got to the end of the traverse and managed to pull my body inelegantly onto the shelf on the main face of the cliff.  Lying there on the shelf, I was grateful I had survived the climb, but I knew it was no victory. 

I wrote a little self-deprecating piece about the experience at the time on Gunks.com (see my post at the bottom of the page).  Until last Friday I hadn't been back.

And this time, climbing Thin Slabs Direct felt... well... tough for 5.7, that's for sure.  And it was still scary, there's no doubt about that.  But mostly climbing it again made me realize how much I've improved.  If you hang off that shelf in just the right way it isn't so pumpy.  There are footholds to be found, they just aren't very big.  And if you turn your body sideways, just so, your feet can really help you, and the clipping isn't so hard.  A little technique will get you there. 

This time, once I committed to the traverse I moved right through it, coming around the corner without a hitch.  It was a great way to end the day, and it nearly erased the bad feelings I got from pitch one of Anguish.

But still, after it was over, there was no escaping one conclusion:  Thin Slabs, with both variations, is a freaking HARD 5.7.  I mean really, what is it with those Gunks sevens?